ISSN 2782-4594 (Print)
ISSN 2782-4608 (Online)


For citation:

Sosnin A. Y. The analysis of the quality of adolescents’ life in modern pedagogical practice in the context of their physical fitness level. Physical Education and University Sport, 2025, vol. 4, iss. 1, pp. 17-26. DOI: 10.18500/2782-4594-2025-4-1-17-26, EDN: CROPSR

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 10)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
[796.015.132+613]-053.6
EDN: 
CROPSR

The analysis of the quality of adolescents’ life in modern pedagogical practice in the context of their physical fitness level

Autors: 
Sosnin Alexander Yu., Secondary comprehensive school no. 38
Abstract: 

Quality of life assessment is a valuable modern method for diagnosing deviations in various types of individual functioning. The aim of the study is to assess the quality of adolescents’ life taking into account their level of physical fitness. The quality of life was analyzed among adolescents aged 15–17 in a comprehensive school (n = 139), a separate analysis was conducted among schoolchildren systematically engaged in physical activity, including sports sections (n = 61). The adapted PEDsQL 4.0 questionnaire (Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory version 4.0) was used, statistical data processing was carried out using nonparametric statistics methods. The highest rates were noted in adolescents’ selfassessment of social functioning, reflecting children’s sociability. A comparative analysis of children’s and parents’ versions of the questionnaire indicated statistically significant differences in characteristics of physical functioning (running, walking, child’s mobility), “Life at school” (role functioning in a team and adaptation to academic workloads) with lower scores in the parents’ questionnaires; and characteristics of emotional functioning, in which adolescents indicated more significant experiences (feelings of fear, sadness, anxiety, bad mood) than in the view of their parents. Gender characteristics of quality of adolescents’ life were established with lower indicators in characteristics of physical and emotional functioning among girls. The comparison of parameters of life quality among adolescent athletes and non-athletes, along with an obviously higher level of physical fitness, indicated a high emotional stability of athletes, but outlined problems of adaptation to academic workload in a comprehensive education institution. The use of quality of life analysis in pedagogical practice allows us to identify unfavorable trends in physical, emotional and social aspects of students’ lives for individual work, including in physical education system.

Reference: 
  1. Novik A. A., Ionova T. I. Rukovodstvo po issledovaniyu kachestva zhizni v meditsine [Guide to quality of life research in medicine]. Moscow, Olma, 2007. 230 p. (in Russian). EDN: WWQMYX
  2. Sosnina S. F., Kabirova N. R., Sokolnikov M. E., Okatenko P. V. Hemoblastoses in offspring of radiation-hazardous industries workers. Health Risk Analysis, 2016, no. 4, pp. 20–26. https://doi.org/10.21668/health.risk/2016.4.03.eng, EDN: RQBHKC
  3. Qiu Y., Yao M., Guo Y., Zhang X., Zhang Sh., Zhang Y., Huang Y., Zhang L. Health-related quality of life of medical students in a Chinese university: A cross-sectional study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2019, vol. 16 (24), pp. 5165. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16245165
  4. Sosnina S. F., Okatenko P. V. Non-infectious pathology in children of female workers of nuclear industry enterprise. Medical Academic Journal, 2017, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 68–76 (in Russian). EDN: ZXLVUT
  5. Kuczynski A. M., Kanter J. W., Robinaugh D. J. Differential associations between interpersonal variables and qualityof- life in a sample of college students. Qual. Life Res., 2020, vol. 29, iss. 1, pp. 127–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02298-3
  6. Antunes Barros R., Silva Menezes M., Lins L. Quality of life of medical students in Brazil. A comparative study. Rev. Med. Chil., 2019, vol. 147, iss. 1, pp. 107–113. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872019000100107
  7. Núñez-Rocha G. M., López-Botello C. K., Salinas- Martínez A. M., Arroyo-Acevedo H. V., Martínez-Villarreal R. T., Ávila-Ortiz M. N. Lifestyle, quality of life, and health promotion needs in Mexican university students: Important differences by sex and academic discipline. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2020, vol. 17 (21), p. 8024. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218024
  8. Volosnikov D. K., Sosnina S. F. The medical social characteristics of families with children of adolescent age residing in the closed administrative territorial formation “Ozersk”. Sociology of Medicine, 2010, no. 2 (17), pp. 59–61 (in Russian). EDN: NTPUWF
  9. Sosnina S. F., Volosnikov D. K. Female teenagers’ health: Sociomedical aspects. Health Сare of the Russian Federation, 2011, no. 3, pp. 43–46 (in Russian). EDN: NWGPSP
  10. Davletova N. H., Tafeeva E. A., Mavliev F. A. Assessment of the quality of life of students of a sports university. Occupational Medicine and Human Ecology, 2021, no. 4 (28), pp. 279–296 (in Russian). EDN: GUBRSF
  11. Barykin S. E., Gushchin V. I., Gushchina M. V. Model to improve the quality of life and social welfare of professional athletes in the context of digitalization of the economy. Social and Economic Systems, 2022, no. 3 (27), pp. 162–190 (in Russian). EDN: HAGIPS
  12. Hudonogov I. Yu., Pevneva M. V., Lyashenko K. N. Gender features of the teenage athletes’ life quality and personal anxiety dynamics (by the health school lessons results). Siberian Journal of Life Sciences and Agriculture, 2023, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 195–220 (in Russian). EDN: LOTWJA
  13. Cekhmejstruk E. A., Shalina N. K. The relationship of balance indicators of stress recovery and quality of life in athletes. Theoretical and Experimental Psychology, 2020, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 70–75 (in Russian). EDN: MKAPPS
  14. Potapova E. A., Zemlyanoj D. A., Antonov A. A., Shcherba E. V. Social and hygienic factors of the quality of life of young athletes. Sanitary Doctor, 2021, no. 2, pp. 25– 36 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.33920/med-08-2102-03, EDN: KSTTPQ
  15. Sosnina S. F. Comprehensive Assessment of the State of Health and Quality of Life of Teenagers of a Closed Administrative- territorial Formation (on the example of Ozersk). Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Med.). Ufa, 2011. 161 p. (in Russian). EDN: QFLSGN
  16. Talibov A. H., Grishaev N. V. Quality of life of athletes (weight lifters) as an element of stage control. Scientific and Pedagogical Schools of the University, 2021, no. 6, pp. 93– 100 (in Russian). EDN: OCNRVH
  17. Varni J. W., Seid M., Kurtin P. S. PedsQL™ 4.0: Reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory version 4.0 generic core scales in healthy and patient populations. Med. Care, 2001, vol. 39, iss. 8, pp. 800–812. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-200108000-00006
  18. Sosnina S. F., Volosnikov D. K. Gender aspects of adolescents’ quality of life. Women’s Health Issues, 2010, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 42–45 (in Russian). EDN: NBLTEL
  19. Bokut’ E. L., Komarova O. N., Rasskazova A. L., Reshetnikova O. V Self-cocept and locus of control attributes as components of personal potential. Bulletin of Tver State University. Series : Pedagogy and Psychology, 2020, no. 4, pp. 6–16 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.26456/vtpsyped/2020.4.006, EDN: FFHIZD
  20. Jozefiak T., Larsson B. Wichstrøm L. Quality of Life as reported by school children and their parents: A cross-sectional survey. Health Qual. Life Outcomes, 2008, vol. 6, article no. 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-6-34
  21. Upton P., Lawford J., Eiser C. Parent-child agreement across child health-related quality of life instruments: A review of the literature. Qual. Life Res., 2008, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 895–913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-008-9350-5
  22. Cremeens J., Eiser C., Blades M. Factors influencing agreement between child self-report and parent proxy-reports on the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ 4.0 (PedsQL™) generic core scales. Health Qual. Life Outcomes, 2006, vol. 4, article no. 58. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-4-58
  23. Hutchings H. A., Upton P., Cheung W. Y. Adaptation of the Manchester-Minneapolis Quality of Life instrument for use in the UK population. Arch. Dis. Child., 2007, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 855–860. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2006.098947
  24. Sosnina S. F., Sokol’nikov M. E. Heritable effects in offspring associated with harmful exposure to parents (Literature review). Radiation Hygiene, 2019, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 84–95 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2019-12-3-84-95, EDN: XGFRSQ
  25. Solis A. C., Lotufo-Neto F. Predictors of quality of life in Brazilian medical students: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Braz. J. Psychiatry, 2019, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 556– 567. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-4446-2018-0116
  26. Kvitchastyj A. V., Badtieva V. A., Sichinava N. V. Assessment of the quality of life in Moscow athletes during covid-19 associated self-isolation. Human. Sport. Medicine, 2022, vol. 22, no. S2, pp. 115–123 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.14529/hsm22s215, EDN: BJUQBF
Received: 
04.11.2024
Accepted: 
30.11.2024
Published: 
26.03.2025