ISSN 2782-4594 (Print)
ISSN 2782-4608 (Online)


For citation:

Akhmatgatin A. A., Struganov S. M., Balashov A. V. Blended learning in physical education of distance students. Physical Education and University Sport, 2024, vol. 3, iss. 4, pp. 375-382. DOI: 10.18500/2782-4594-2024-3-4-375-382, EDN: PQHPYO

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 9)
Language: 
Russian
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
796:37.018.43
EDN: 
PQHPYO

Blended learning in physical education of distance students

Autors: 
Akhmatgatin Anvar Amirovich, Kuban State Agrarian University named after I. T. Trubilin
Struganov Sergey M., East Siberian Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation
Balashov Alexander V., Irkutsk State University
Abstract: 

This article presents the features of mastering the academic discipline “Physical Education and Sport” by university distance students, as well as problems related to its teaching. Some trends in the development of educational systems related to the use of information technologies, in particular, distance learning and a blended form of organization of the educational process, as the most promising, are considered. It was assumed that the use of blended learning would ensure an increase in the success of solving educational problems of the discipline “Physical Education and Sport”, taught to distance students. To test this assumption, a pedagogical experiment was conducted, in which distance students participated, divided into control and experimental groups of 20 people each. In the experimental group, the educational process was organized using blended learning, in the control group – in the traditional form. During this pedagogical experiment, it was found that distance students who mastered the discipline “Physical Education and Sport” using the blended form of education showed better theoretical knowledge, as well as methodological and practical skills in the field of physical culture and sports compared to the distance students who mastered it in the traditional way. As a result of the conducted research, high efficiency of blended learning in mastering the academic discipline “Physical Education and Sport” by distant students has been established.

Reference: 
  1. Nikolaev Y. M. Modern physical education theory of the early XXI century. Theory and Practice of Physical Culture, 2017, no. 11, pp. 94–98 (in Russian). EDN: ZRCBRH
  2. Solovyov G. M. The genesis of the formation of modern goal setting for physical culture in the education system. Theory and Practice of Physical Culture, 2003, no. 8, pp. 10–14 (in Russian).
  3. Davidenko D. N. Assessment of the formation of physical culture of students in the educational process of a technical university. Theory and Practice of Physical Culture, 2006, no. 2, pp. 2–6 (in Russian). EDN: MBXIBJ
  4. Mikhailov O. V., Denisova Ya. V. Distance learning at Russian universities: “Step forward, two steps back”? Higher Education in Russia, 2020, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 65–76 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-10-65-76, EDN: PHBEGU
  5. Goncharova O. N., Halilova M.Yu. Features of distance learning in higher education institutions in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Open Education, 2022, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 34–41 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.21686/1818-4243-2022-1-34-41, EDN: ORMNKE
  6. Nikitin G. M. Tsifrovye tehnologii obuchenija v gumanitarnykh naukakh: monografija (Digital learning technologies in the humanities: Monograph). Moscow, IPR Media, 2022. 124 p. Available at: https://www.iprbookshop.ru/118884.html (accessed June 12, 2024) (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.23682/118884, EDN: RMGLAF
  7. Solovov A. V., Menshikova A. A. Coronavirus zigzags of electronic distance learning. Higher Education in Russia, 2021, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 60–69 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-6-60-69, EDN: DQCAGO
  8. Kostov F. F., Ugryumov A. S., Yakovlev G. A. Distance lessons of physical education at the higher education institution in comparison with the traditional form of training. Theory and Practice of Physical Culture, 2022, no. 9, pp. 78–80 (in Russian). EDN: HKLZOQ
  9. Piskun O. E., Ababkova M. Yu., Leontyeva V. L., Kovaleva Yu. A. Indicators of emotional state of students when mastering the theory course in physical education. Theory and Practice of Physical Culture, 2022, no. 9, pp. 78–80 (in Russian). EDN: NIGAYC
  10. Blinov V. I., Esenina E. Yu., Sergeev I. S. Models of blended learning: Organizational and didactic typology. Higher Education in Russia, 2021, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 44–64 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-5-44-64, EDN: YMTLMQ
  11. Kapustin Yu. I. Pedagogical and Organizational Conditions for the Effective Combination of Full-time Education and the use of Distance Education Technologies. Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Ped.). Moscow, 2007. 40 p. (in Russian).
  12. Kodrle S. V. Specifics of distance learning technologies application in foreign language teaching at university settings. CITISJe [CITISE], 2022, no. 3, pp. 317–327 (in Russian). http://doi.org/10.15350/2409-7616.2022.3.28, EDN: TUVXAH
  13. Lomonosova N. V. Blended Learning System in the Context of Informatization of Higher Education. Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Ped.). Moscow, 2018. 24 p. (in Russian).
  14. Staker H., Horn M. B. Classifying K-12 Blended Learning, 2012. 22 p. Available at: http://www.christenseninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Classifyi... (accessed June 12, 2024).
  15. Horn M. B., Staker H. The Rise of K-12 Blended Learning: Profiles of Emerging Models. San Mateo, CA, Innosight Institute, 2011. 184 p. Available at: https:// www.christenseninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/The-rise-of-K-12... (accessed June 12, 2024).
Received: 
17.06.2024
Accepted: 
30.07.2024
Published: 
13.01.2025